|Home||Membership||About Prasar Bharati||Significance of Prasar Bharati||About Friends of Prasar Bharati|
|What you can say||What you can do||Recent news||Responsibility of Public Service Broadcasting|
Up loaded on Monday February 08, 2010
Paid news culture is only a symptom of a deeper disease says,
Prasar Bharati chairperson Mrinal Pandey.
India’s media has won praise for bringing pressure on the authorities to bring to book the high and mighty for corruption and misdeeds. Now it finds itself in the dock, accused of selling editorial space.
Rumours have been afloat since the parliamentary elections last year (2009) that journalists and media groups had provided favourable coverage to paying political parties and candidates.
The future of ethical journalism is in jeopardy if effective, immediate and multi-level steps are not initiated to counter alarming trends like “paid news” in media, alerted a panel discussion of editors, organised as part of the national convention of the Network of Women in Media, India (NWMI), held at Calicut, Kerala on Saturday 06-02-10.
Talking on the topic ‘Media Ethics and Paid News,’ Prasar Bharati chairperson Mrinal Pandey said the present degeneration was result of a regressive process that started in the 80s. “The rot we see in the periphery now is only a symptom of a deeper disease,” she said.
Ms. Pandey, who observed that dilution of professionalism and compromising recruitment of professionals, were major factors that led to the present crisis in the industry.
On November 04,2010 , Vice President Mohmmad Hamid Ansari while inaugurating the Workshop on "Parliament and Media" in New Delhi had told that Paid news could jeopardise democracy and reminded journalists their primary duty of protecting the people's right to information .Referring to the 'pay packages' given to journalists by political parties during elections Vice President observed that "The Press Council has noted that paid news could cause double jeopardy to Indian democracy through a damaging influence on press functioning as well as on the free and fair election process. It underscored the urgent need to protect the public's right to information so that it was not misled in deciding the selection quotient of the candidates contesting elections."
|||||| Thank you for your interest.||||||